Saturday, February 3, 2007

Can Our Thoughts Change The World?

Can Our Thoughts Change The World? Scientists Team With Author to Create World's Largest Mind-Over-Matter Experiment Top scientists team up with author to create the world's largest ever mind-over-matter experiment.

London, England (PRWeb) January 6, 2007 --
Can our thoughts influence the world around us? This extraordinary possibility is being tested throughout 2007 in a series of mind-over-matter experiments that are being monitored by leading physicists.

Tens of thousands of volunteers from around the world are being recruited to participate in a series of web-based experiments, making it the largest mind-over-matter study in history.
The experiments are the brain-child of science writer Lynne McTaggart, whose new book The Intention Experiment forms the catalyst for the trials. The book is published in the New Year in the US, (Simon & Schuster) the UK (Harper Collins) and The Netherlands (Ankh-Hermes).
Working with her are leading physicists and psychologists from the University of Arizona, Princeton University, the International Institute of Biophysics and the Institute of Noetic Sciences.

The first large-scale studies are being prepared by Dr. Gary Schwartz, psychologist and director of America's National Institutes of Medicine-funded Center for Frontier Medicine in Biofield Science at the University of Arizona.

Besides Schwartz, other scientists working in the consortium include: German physicist Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp of the International Institute of Biophysics in Neuss, Germany; Dr. Robert Jahn and Brenda Dunne of the International Consciousness Research Laboratory, formerly of Princeton University; and Drs Marilyn Schlitz and Dean Radin of the Institute of Noetic Sciences in California.

Through the Intention Experiment website (www.theintentionexperiment.com), readers of McTaggart's new book are invited to participate in an unprecedented experiment: to test the power of their thoughts.

The study will conduct periodic large-scale experiments to determine whether the focused intention of its readers has an effect on scientifically quantifiable targets in various laboratories around the globe -- a specific living thing or a population where change caused by group intention can be measured.

Website specialists working with the scientists through the website will coordinate reader involvement and track results.

A pilot experiment, testing the idea and detailed in the book, was successful. McTaggart asked a group of 16 meditators based in London to direct their thoughts to four remote targets in Dr. Popp's laboratory in Germany: two types of algae, a plant and a human volunteer. The meditators were asked to attempt to lower certain measurable biodynamic processes.
Popp and his team discovered significant changes in all four targets while the intentions were being sent, compared to times the meditators were 'resting.'

Schwartz and McTaggart are preparing the target for the first intention experiment target, an enclosed 'mini-Gaia' with an artificially raised temperature. The plan is to ask the readers to attempt to lower it at a particular moment through focused 'intention.'

"If we're successful the implications would be amazing," says Schwartz. "It would suggest that our collective human consciousness can actually do something about global warming."
In the course of her research into her earlier book, The Field, McTaggart uncovered literally hundreds of scientific studies carried out by reputable frontier scientists, which suggested that consciousness, under certain circumstances, has the capacity to change physical matter.
These studies, all published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, showed evidence that directing thoughts at a target is capable of altering machines, cells and, indeed, entire multicelled organisms like human beings.

The ongoing experiments will solely focus on philanthropic targets. Other possibilities being discussed by the scientific consortium include using a child with Attention Deficit Disorder or an adult with Alzheimer's disease.

One eventual target could be determining whether focused group intention will enable wounds to heal more quickly than usual. It is known and accepted that wounds generally heal at a particular, quantifiable rate with a precise pattern. Any departure from the norm can be precisely measured and shown to be an experimental effect.

The global Intention Experiment laboratory is to be entirely self-funded. The website and all the experiments will be funded by the proceeds of the book or grants, now and in the future.
McTaggart stresses that she cannot guarantee that the big experiments will work -- at first or ever. "As scientists and objective researchers, we will be duty-bound to faithfully report the data we have. But what's most important is just being willing to ask the questions," says McTaggart. "That's what real science is, and that's what we're doing with the Intention Experiments. Just being unafraid to ask what seems like a outrageous question."

The Intention Experiment, published by Free Press, Simon & Schuster in the US (HarperCollins in the UK), is the first book firmly grounded in science that explains how human thoughts and intentions are an actual physical something.

The Intention Experiment builds on the discoveries of McTaggart's first book, international bestseller The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe, The Field, which documented discoveries that point to the existence of a quantum energy field holding everything -- including each one of us -- in its invisible web.

The Field was lauded around the world, by notables such Sir Arthur C. Clarke and Dr. Wayne Dyer, as the first book to synthesize all the discoveries from frontier quantum physicists about the nature of consciousness into a unified theory, comprehensive to the ordinary layman. Dyer called it "the most profound and enlightening book I have ever read."

For more information please contact:Pavel MikoloskiLiving the FieldLondonDDI:+44 (0)208 971 1660Main:+44 (0)208 944 9555Fax: +44 (0)870 444 9887

Only the Shadow Knows

Over the years, small fire storms erupt in the remote viewing community over questions such as, 'who wrote the CRV manual?' 'Was Ingo involved in the process at all?' 'Did Ingo approve the content in the manual?'

No one has ever disputed that Paul H. Smith was the primary author of the manual. However, the close collaboration of other unit members who also studied under Ingo is oft overlooked. It would appear that Ingo did indeed read and approve of the manual prior to it's publication. Supporting documentation in the form of a letter sent from Ingo to the collaborating members of the Fort Meade unit has been posted on Paul's website [ http://www.rviewer.com/prenote.html ] as an added preliminary comment to the CRV manual.

Steve Hammonds thoughtful articles

Steve Hammons has worked as a journalist, editor, counselor, juvenile probation peace officer, public safety urgent response specialist, teacher, instructor and U.S. Government researcher. He graduated from Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, with studies in communications (journalism focus) and health education (psychology focus). Hammons’ two novels tell the story of a U.S. intelligence and joint-service military research team investigating unusual phenomena.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cautious Approach is Wise on Project SERPO, Sensitive Information
By Steve Hammons
Feb 1, 2007

The sky didn't fall. Society didn't collapse because remote viewing programs became public.
In fact, when you learn about what these people accomplished, it can make us respect their willingness to "think outside the box." They took bold and creative steps to discover important kinds of knowledge that is still developing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

‘Remote Viewing' Important For Us Now
By Steve Hammons
Jan 23, 2007

Looking at the many challenges we face as individuals, families, communities, nations, cultures and as the human race on Earth, we may find that the natural, but often untapped, abilities we all possess can be very helpful in making progress. In addition to our normal skills and efforts in a wide range of everyday human endeavors, the somewhat unconventional areas often called “remote viewing” and “anomalous cognition” should also be added to our list of resources and assets.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'Remote Viewing' has Basis in Science, Military Intelligence
By Steve Hammons
Jan 19, 2007
'Remote viewing' is a technique and skill that is quite interesting. Remote viewing usually refers to the original program sponsored by CIA, DIA and Army intelligence during the 70s, 80s and early 90s as well as offshoots of those techniques that have developed since. . . . At the least, it is interesting to read these stories and learn about the research. At most, it could change us for the better and contribute to the advancement of science, medicine and the human condition.

A Curious (and undaunted) Mind: Dean Radin

I have to applaud Dean Radin for his fearless and undaunted stance in dealing with the ridicule of a timid establishment that seeks to quash all curiosity - and yet, with the oddest twist of character, the same suspects demonstrate the temirity to present themselves as scientists.
Dr. Radin demonstrates a mastery of the art of non-attachment.
- Shelia
----------------
News Released: January 30, 2007
(PRLEAP.COM) Join host Alex Tsakiris when he interviews parapsychologist Dr. Dean Radin of the Institute of Noetic Sciences, about navigating the perilous field of parapsychology research. During the 45-minute interview Radin suggests paranormal experiences are more common than most scientists publicly admit.
“In private, virtually all scientists, including the most severe skeptics, will admit to interesting things that go bump in the night. In public, they’ll find a completely different way to talk about their experience,” Radin says.
He also discusses the challenges psi researchers face.“If you portray a controversial message, it would appear that the more conservative you are the better, but I believe this is actually false. I know a number of colleagues who were absolute mainstream, with no connection to anything controversial at all expect for psi, and they were marginalized only because of their interest in this field” claims Radin.

And, how he navigates the controversy. “I don’t care too much what other people think about what I do. I’m much more interested in exploring and finding out about the nature of the world. So, if someone makes a claim that seems incredible and I have the time and the interest to look at it – I go look at it,” Radin explains. The interview is available for immediate free download at: www.skeptiko.com/index.php?id=9